PDA

View Full Version : Islam-A religion of Terror?


Lulua
04-01-2002, 16:26
Islam - A Religion of Terror ?

Invitation to Islam, Issue 5, October 1998



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A bomb goes off in a marketplace in Jerusalem. A suicide bomber launches himself into a bus full of women and children in Tel Aviv. Foreign tourists get massacred at a holiday resort in Luxor, Egypt. Villages upon villages get annihilated in Algeria. The list of events worldwide which have come to symbolise the 'Islamic terror' are endless. From the times in the 70's and 80's when Pan Am and TWA aeroplanes would be highjacked, to the mid 80's in war torn Lebanon where Americans and Europeans would be held as hostages for years; all such incidents have come to be identified with the religion of Islam. Such incidents from past and present have undoubtedly affected Muslims worldwide and more so in the West. Any Muslim, who wants to practice his/her religion and expresses the pious desire to live under the banner of Islam, is labelled a fundamentalist or extremist. Any Muslim man who walks down a busy street in London or Paris (and Paris moreso) with a beard and a scarf on his head, is looked upon as being a terrorist who's probably got an AK47 stashed somewhere on his person. Muslim women who are veiled can't go anywhere in the Western world without being taunted as being oppressed or being mad (for covering up). However, are such beliefs and opinions about Islam really justified?

Exploding the myth

One of the many short comings which has arisen in the West, is judging Islam by the conduct of a minority of its people. By doing this, segments of Western society have deliberately played off the desperate actions of many Muslims, and have given it the name of Islam. Such behaviour is clearly not objective and seeks to distort the reality of Islam. For if such a thing was done Judge a religion by the conduct of its people) then we too could say that all Christianity is about is child molesting and homosexuality [1] whilst Hinduism was all about looting and breaking up mosques [2]. Generalising in such a manner is not seen as being objective, yet we find that the Western world is foremost in propagating this outlook on Islam. So what is the reality of Islam? How does one dispel the myths which have been created and spread so viciously? The only way to examine Islam is to simply examine its belief system. Look at its sources, the Qur'an and Sunna, and see what they have to say. This is the way to find the truth about what Islam says about terror, terrorism and terrorists. One who is sincerely searching for the truth, will do it no other way. The very name Islam comes from the Arabic root word 'salama' which means peace. Islam is a religion which is based upon achieving peace through the submission to the will of Allah. Thus, by this very simple linguistic definition, one can ascertain as to what the nature of this religion is. If such a religion is based on the notion of peace, then how is it that so many acts done by its adherents are contrary to peace? The answer is simple. Such actions, if not sanctioned by the religion, have no place with it. They are not Islamic and should not be thought of as Islamic.

Jihad

The word jihad sends shivers down the spines of many Westerners. They readily equate this term with violence and oppression. However, it must be said that the meaning of jihad, as a 'holy war', is something which is totally foreign and not from Islam. If anything, such a description belongs more so to Christianity and its adherents. It was terms like this which were used to justify the slaughter and pillage of towns and cities during the crusades by the Christians. By simply looking into the sources of Islam, one is able to know that the true meaning of jihad is to strive/make effort in the way of Allah. Thus striving in the way of Allah can be both peaceful and physical. The Prophet Muhammed (saws) said:

"The best jihad is (by) the one who strives against his own self for Allah, The Mighty and Majestic" [3]

In the Qur'an, Allah also says:

"So obey not the disbelievers, but make a great jihad (effort) against them (by preaching) with it (the Qur'an)"
(Surah Al-Furqan 25:52)

By controlling and fighting against ones desires, the Muslims can then also physically exert themselves in the path of Allah. It is this physical or combative jihad which receives so much criticism. Because of the sheer ignorance of this type of jihad Islam is regarded as terror, and Muslims are regarded as terrorists. However, the very purpose of this physical jihad is to raise the word of Allah uppermost. By doing this, it liberates and emancipates all those who are crying out for freedom all over the world. If the likes of the pacifists of this world had their way, then the world would indeed be full of anarchy and mischief. The combative jihad seeks to correct this as Allah says in the Qur'an:

"And if Allah did not check one set of people by means of another, the Earth would be full of mischief. But Allah is full of bounty to the worlds"
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:251)


Such would be the corruption on this Earth if there had never been a combative jihad that Allah says:

"For had it not been that Allah checks one set of people by means of another, monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is mentioned much, would surely have been pulled down. Indeed Allah will help those who help His (cause). Truly Allah is All strong, All mighty"
(Surah Al-Hajj 22:40)

This combative jihad being both defensive and offensive, is something which is commanded by Allah upon the Muslims. Through this command the oppressed and weak are rescued from the tyranny of the world:


"And what is the matter with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and for those weak, ill treated and oppressed among men, women and children whose only cry is; 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors and raise for us from you one who will protect and raise for us from you one who will help"
(Surah An-Nisa 4:75)


Anyone who knows the early history of Islam, will know that all those nations and empires which came under the fold of Islam were indeed previously oppressed. When the companions of the Prophet Muhammed (saws) went out for the offensive jihad against the Egyptians, the Persians and the Romans, we find that the people did not resist against them at all. Rather, they accepted Islam on such a scale, that it is inconceivable that the jihad of Islam could be anything other then a liberation for these people; a liberation from centuries of tyranny. In fact, with the Byzantine Egyptians and the people of Spain, the Muslims were even beckoned to come and liberate these lands from the oppression of their kings. This is the glorious track record of the Muslim jihad. Compare this with the brutal track record of warfare in the Western world over the centuries. From the crusades against the Muslims to the days of colonial warfare, the Western world has killed, destroyed and plundered everything which has come in its way. Even today this merciless killing goes on by the Western nations. While claiming to be about world peace and security, Western nations are ready to bomb innocent civilians at the drop of a hat. The classic example of this is the recent bombings of Sudan and Afghanistan. Whilst claiming that Sudan and Afghanistan were havens for Islamic terrorists, the bombings of these two nations could not have come at a better time for the American president Bill Clinton. The destruction of innocent lives which were a result of these bombings clearly seem to have been an attempt by Clinton to avert attention away from his sexual misdemeanours; [4] something which he so often gets caught up in. Without doubt this was the reason for such terror from the American military upon innocent people. This is the same American military which claims to enter the worlds trouble spots under the guise of being peace keepers. But

"… when it is said to them; 'Make not mischief on the Earth', they say; 'We are only peace makers'. Indeed they are the ones who make mischief, but they perceive it not"
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:11-12)

The hypocrisy of the West is indeed astounding.

By looking at the rules and regulations of this combative jihad it will be clear to any sincere person that this is indeed the religion of truth. When fighting an unjust enemy, no matter how unjust they are, it is forbidden by Islam that their retreating forces are mutilated, tortured or slaughtered. The treacherous violation of treaties and carrying out assassinations after a cease fire, are also prohibited. Allah says in the Qur'an:


"And fight in the way of Allah those who fight you. But do not transgress the limits. Truly Allah loves not the transgressors"
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:190)

Not transgressing the limits means not to kill women and children, for the Messenger of Allah (saws) "forbade the killing of women and children" [5]. Not transgressing the limits means that the elderly, the sick, monks, worshippers and hired labourers are not attacked. Not transgressing the limits means not killing animals wantonly, burning crops and vegetation, polluting waters and destroying homes, monasteries, churches and synagogues:

"Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly with those who fought not against you on account of religion, nor drove you out of your homes. Indeed, Allah loves those who deal with equity"
(Surah Al-Mumtahinah 60:8)

After reading such passages from the Qur'an and knowing about what Islam commands and prohibits in jihad, the rules of warfare are given a new meaning; a meaning of justice. How sad it is then, that whilst Islam is condemned for striking terror into the hearts of the people, the likes of the Serbs, the Indian army in Kashmir and the Israeli soldiers in Palestine are left untarnished for the atrocities they have committed in the name of warfare.

So what about suicide bombing, is this too a part of jihad in Allah's path? From what has already been stated above, it can be deduced that this is not from the religion. However, unfortunately many Muslims have taken suicide bombing as being a virtuous act by which one receives reward. This could not be further from the truth. The Prophet (saws) said: "Those who go to extremes are destroyed" [6]. Suicide bombing is undoubtedly an extremity which has reached the ranks of the Muslims. In the rules of warfare, we find no sanction for such an act from the behaviour and words of the Prophet Muhammed (saws) and his companions. Unfortunately, today (some misguided) Muslims believe that such acts are paving the way for an Islamic revival and a return to the rule of Islam's glorious law. However, we fail to bear in mind that the Prophet (saws) said:

"Do not be delighted by the action of anyone, until you see how he ends up" [7]

So, for example what is the end of a suicide bomber in Palestine?, a leg here, an arm there. Massive retaliation by the Israeli's in the West Bank and Gaza. More Muslims killed and persecuted. How can we be delighted with such an end? What really hammers the final nail in the coffin of this act, is that it is suicide; something which is clearly forbidden in Islam. The Messenger of Allah (saws) said:

"He who kills himself with anything, Allah will torment him with that in the fire of Hell" [8]

Some are under the misconception that by killing oneself for an Islamic cause, one commits an act which deserves Paradise. Once when a man killed himself, the Prophet (saws) said: "He is a dweller of the Fire". When the people were surprised at this, the Prophet (saws) said:

"A person performs the deeds which to the people appears to be the deeds befitting the dweller of Paradise, but he is in fact one of the dwellers of the Fire" [9]

The taking of ones life which Allah has given as a trust to the human, is a great sin. Likewise the taking of other lives (which is so often the case with suicide bombing) is also forbidden, as human life is indeed precious:

"...If anyone killed a person not in retaliation for murder or to spread mischief in the land, it would be as if he killed the whole of mankind. And (likewise) if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole of mankind"
(Surah Al-Maaida 5:32)

Thus, all other types of extremities such as hostage taking, hijacking and planting bombs in public places, are clearly forbidden in Islam.

The Media

By going through the teachings of Islam, it is clear that such a religion has only come to benefit mankind - not to destroy it. So why is there so much hatred for this noble religion in the West? The answer is simple, the media. It is the Jewish influenced media of the West which has portrayed Islam to be something that it is not. During the 70's and 80's when the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organisation) were carrying out daring highjacks on the worlds airways, the media in the West portrayed it as being Islamic. When the Shi'ite suicide bombers of the 80's were causing so much havoc in the Lebanon and in the Gulf region, the media in the West portrayed it as a part of Islam. However, it is known by the heads of the media that the likes of the PLO were not an Islamic organisation, and that according to Islam, Shi'ites are outside the fold of Islam [10]. Yet such facts are never portrayed by a media which seeks to cover the truth of this religion. A number of years ago, when the Oklahoma City bomb went off, a headline in one of the newspapers, 'Today' [11], summed up this attitude. With a picture of a fire fighter holding a dead child in his arms, the headline read: "In The Name of Islam" Time has of course proven that this bigoted assumption was incorrect, as Timothy McVeigh, a right wing radical now faces the death penalty for the crime [12]. Likewise the bombs which went off in the Paris metro in 1995, were also blamed on Muslim fanatics. It has now emerged that the Algerian secret service who having routinely bribed many European journalists and MPs, were actually behind it. The desire to throw a veil over Islam is immense by these people:

"They intend to put out the light of Allah with their mouths, but Allah will complete His light even though the disbelievers hate (it)"
(Surah As-Saff 61:8)

Whilst trying to destroy Islam through this instrument of the media, the Jews clearly try to portray an image of themselves as being the oppressed people. Every year, we are reminded as to how many Jews perished under the Nazis in World War II. We are made to feel sorry for these same people who have gone on to commit so many crimes upon the Palestinian people. Some may say that this is a racist and biased viewpoint. But we say; If this media was not run and orchestrated by the Jews and was truly neutral, then why are Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, two former Israeli prime ministers, not held aloft as being terrorists? Anyone who knows about the history of the Palestinian occupation will tell you that these two men were members of the Stern Gang and Irgun, two notorious Jewish terror groups who killed many innocent people [13]. If this media was truly impartial, then why does it not tell about the extent of the Israeli bombardment and illegal occupation of Southern Lebanon and its people? [14] And if this media really had nothing against the religion of Allah, then why does it not inform the people that every day hundreds are entering the religion of Islam? Such things will never be highlighted in the Western media, simply because to do so would be against their very interests.

With such immense pressure against it, it is indeed a blessing from Allah that Islam goes from strength to strength. It continues to grow faster then any other religion in the Western world, conquering the hearts and minds of thousands. All this should not even surprise us though, for Allah has promised us that this religion will prevail:

"It is He who has sent His Messenger with the guidance and the religion of truth, so that He may make it victorious over all other religions, even though the disbelievers detest it"
(Surah As-Saff 61:9)

It is a must that humanity comes towards the religion of Islam. Without it, we will continue to slip down the road of inequity and darkness. With it we can establish a society of justice and peace. Religion of terror? ... no. The way forward? ... yes.

"There is no compulsion in religion. The right path has indeed become distinct from the wrong. So whoever rejects false worship and believes in Allah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allah is All Hearing, All Knowing"
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:256)



Footnotes

1 By using the many cases of child abuse and homosexuality by priests, Such a generalisation about Christianity could be made
2 By using the incident of the destruction of the Babri mosque in Ayodya, India in December 1992 by Hindu zealots, such generalisations could be made about Hinduism
3 Authentic - Reported by At-Tabaranee
4 Years of sexual liaison with a White House aide, Monica Lewinski, has been proved against Mr Clinton. Since this time, a number of other women have also claimed that they have had affairs with the president. And this is the same man who propagates family values and to whom millions look up to!
5 Reported by Bukhari - Eng. Trans, Vol.4, p. 160, No. 258
6 Authentic - Reported by Ahmed
7 Authentic - Reported by Ahmed
8 Reported by Muslim - Eng. Trans, Vol. 1, p.62, No.203
9 Reported by Muslim - Eng. Trans, Vol. 1, p.64, No.206
10 The beliefs which are contained in the books of the Shi'ites places them outside of the fold of Islam generally. However, upon the individual Shi'ite, the proofs need to be established before one can say that he or she is a disbeliever
11 This newspaper no longer exists
12 It is strange indeed that whilst the Western media criticises Islamic law for being barbaric and harsh, not a word is said about the fact that McVeigh too will be executed just as someone would in an Islamic state
13 These two groups killed Arabs, Jews and the British. They are accredited with the massacre at the village of Deir Yassin, in which many innocent people were butchered
14 Despite the fact that the UN has even made a resolution against Israel for this illegal occupation, no 'democratic peace loving nation' (like the USA!!) has bothered to implement it



Related Articles

ATTACK ON USA - THE MUSLIM RESPONSE

Attacks are an "injustice, oppression and tyranny" - The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia

"US Attacks a Terrible Crime in Islam" - The Chief Justice of the Supreme Judiciary Council of Saudi Arabia

The Islamic Verdict on Hijacking and Kidnapping

The Islamic Verdict on Suicide Bombings

Jihad Explained

seekeroftruth
06-01-2002, 22:56
>
>So what about suicide bombing, is
>this too a part of
>jihad in Allah's path? From
>what has already been stated
>above, it can be deduced
>that this is not from
>the religion. However, unfortunately many
>Muslims have taken suicide bombing
>as being a virtuous act
>by which one receives reward.
>This could not be further
>from the truth. The Prophet
>(saws) said: "Those who go
>to extremes are destroyed" [6].
>Suicide bombing is undoubtedly an
>extremity which has reached the
>ranks of the Muslims. In
>the rules of warfare, we
>find no sanction for such
>an act from the behaviour
>and words of the Prophet
>Muhammed (saws) and his companions.
>Unfortunately, today (some misguided) Muslims
>believe that such acts are
>paving the way for an
>Islamic revival and a return
>to the rule of Islam's
>glorious law. However, we fail
>to bear in mind that
>the Prophet (saws) said:
>
>"Do not be delighted by the
>action of anyone, until you
>see how he ends up"
>[7]
>
>So, for example what is the
>end of a suicide bomber
>in Palestine?, a leg here,
>an arm there. Massive retaliation
>by the Israeli's in the
>West Bank and Gaza. More
>Muslims killed and persecuted. How
>can we be delighted with
>such an end? What really
>hammers the final nail in
>the coffin of this act,
>is that it is suicide;
>something which is clearly forbidden
>in Islam. The Messenger of
>Allah (saws) said:
>
>"He who kills himself with anything,
>Allah will torment him with
>that in the fire of
>Hell" [8]
>
>Some are under the misconception that
>by killing oneself for an
>Islamic cause, one commits an
>act which deserves Paradise. Once
>when a man killed himself,
>the Prophet (saws) said: "He
>is a dweller of the
>Fire". When the people were
>surprised at this, the Prophet
>(saws) said:
>
>"A person performs the deeds which
>to the people appears to
>be the deeds befitting the
>dweller of Paradise, but he
>is in fact one of
>the dwellers of the Fire"
>[9]
>
>The taking of ones life which
>Allah has given as a
>trust to the human, is
>a great sin. Likewise the
>taking of other lives (which
>is so often the case
>with suicide bombing) is also
>forbidden, as human life is
>indeed precious:
>
>"...If anyone killed a person not
>in retaliation for murder or
>to spread mischief in the
>land, it would be as
>if he killed the whole
>of mankind. And (likewise) if
>anyone saved a life, it
>would be as if he
>saved the whole of mankind"
>
>(Surah Al-Maaida 5:32)
>
>Thus, all other types of extremities
>such as hostage taking, hijacking
>and planting bombs in public
>places, are clearly forbidden in
>Islam.
>


A good article in general sister, but the issue of 'suicide' bombing is something that 'striked' me!!

I and like all other muslims 'will' agree with the hijacking and extreme aspects which have been done by muslims that are not allowed in islam (by knowing what 'exactly' that incident is), but this topic of 'suicide bombing' OR IN OTHER WORDS'martyrdom operations' as called by scholars. These are some links/articles useful to this topic, not sucide bombing, invented by the west.



This is a article i found and have kept on my HD;
----------------------------

Is the Palestinian "Suicide Bombing" in Israel's cities lawful in Islaam?

According to Islaam, if the enemy kills civilians from us, then they have declared a war from all directions upon us. We as Muslims must not start killing civilians, because in Islaam, we are forbidden to start it: "...if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people...(Noble Qur'ân 5:32)"

But when we are confronted with an enemy that doesn't care about civilization and human value and worth, then the Noble Qur'ân instructs us: "O ye who believe! the law of equality is prescribed to you in cases of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, the woman for the woman. But if any remission is made by the brother of the slain, then grant any reasonable demand, and compensate him with handsome gratitude, this is a concession and a Mercy from your Lord. After this whoever exceeds the limits shall be in grave penalty. (The Noble Qur'ân, 2:178)"

As to the Palestinian suicide bombers today, the religious leaders of the Islamic organizations inside Palestine made it very clear that they are giving the verdict (fatwa) to kill the civilian Jews inside Israel, because (1) the Jews are killing civilians from us; and (2) the Jews are building more settlements and are not withdrawing from the lands that they were not supposed to be in since 1991.

So my answer would be, may Allah Almighty bless our Muslim brothers and sisters in Palestine and grant the Highest Levels of Paradise to its Suicide Bombers.

Source: http://www.salaf.indiaaccess.com/us/suicide_bombing.htm
-------------------------------------------

Another useful, quite long (sorry in advance) but i found it very helpful regarding this topic;


---------------------------------------------

The Islamic Legitimacy
of The "Martyrdom Operations"
The "martyrdom operation", "Jihad-bombing-assault", or what people mistakenly call "suicidal attack" is a controversial issue nowadays: is it Islamically legitimate or not?
The term "martyrdom operation" refers to when the Mujahed (the one who fights for the cause of Allah) puts explosive materials in his car or encircles himself with, sneaks into the enemy land, then blows it up where he determines their harm, killing some of them and is killed as well.


Martyrdom NOT Suicide

Before presenting the Islamic evidences that such operations are Islamically legitimate, we need to emphasise that it is wrong to call such operations a "suicide". Killing one's self aggressively or casting one's self into destruction, all of which are forbidden in the Qur'an "and do not cast yourself into destruction" [S2, V195].

The word " destruction" here, according to the majority of Muslim scholars, means "investing money and giving up Al-Jihad (Holy War)". It is narrated by al-Tirmidhee through Aslam Abi Umran, that during the Battle of Kastantinia, a Muslim undertook to fight many of the enemies himself; he penetrated the Roman army killing some of them and was killed. As a reaction, some Muslims said: "he has cast himself into destruction". Abu Aiyub Al-ansari replied: "you are misinterpreting this verse, it is about us "al-Ansar"; when Islam was dignified by Allah and Islam had received many other supporters, some of us said secretly away from the prophet "our money is lost, Islam is dignified and its supporters are numerous, it is better to stay at home and invest our money". At that time, Allah revealed to His prophet in reply "Give generously for the cause of Allah and do not with your own hands cast yourselves into destruction." [S2, V195]. So, destruction here means investing money and avoiding Al-Jihad.

It is out of discussion that suicide is Islamically forbidden. It is considered as one of the greatest wrong-doings after Al-Shirk "polytheism", for Allah says: "Do not kill yourselves. Allah is merciful to you, but he that does that through wickedness and injustice shall be burnt in fire. That is easy enough for Allah".

The prophet (s.a.w.) stated that the one who commits suicide is enternally in Hell. According to Abu Huraira, the prophet (s.a.w.) says: "The one who throws himself from a mountain and kills himself will be eternally in Hell."

It is important to know that suicide is forbidden because of its evil objectives; such as impatience, desperation or any other bad and evil objects. In Jundob Bin Junada's Hadith, the Prophet (s.a.w.) said: "In the past, there was a wounded man who impatiently cut his hand bleeding to death, Allah said: 'my slave took the first step to death, he is forbidden to enter Paradise'." So, killing one's self this way is "suicide" as it is Islamically pointless, meaningless and intentionally suicidal.

On the other hand, the one who contributes his life to the cause of Allah, Islam and Muslims his doing is sacrificial; he gives his life away for Islam and Muslims, which is the highest sacrifice.

The history of Islam is full of heroic and sacrificial events. It is narrated by Abu Dawood through one of the Prophet's companions, he said: "we mounted an attacked on a part of Hunain, one of us followed an unbeliever to kill him, by a mistake killed himself. The prophet (s.a.w.) said: 'O, Muslims... your brother'. We rushed to check him, but found him dead. The Prophet (s.a.w.) wrapped him with his own clothes and his blood on him, then performed the prayer of the dead, the Prophet's companions asked: is he a martyr? He said: "he is, and I am a witness". Therefore, the one who blows up the enemies of Allah by blowing up himself as well cannot be considered a suicide, and he is, Allah willing, a martyr.

The Qur'anic evidences that such assaults are Islamically legitimate

l Allah says: "and some people would give away their lives to gain Allah's contentment. Allah is compassionate to his servants". It is said that this verse of the Qur'an is about Suhaib the Roman as he believed in Islam, in his way to Madinah to meet the prophet (s.a.w.), some Kuraishes followed him, he got off his horse carrying his quiver and shield and said: "you know that I am the best archer among you, by Allah, you cannot reach me till I throw all my arrows, and then hit with my sword as much as I could and then you can do whatever you wish." They said: "we shall not allow you to go away as a rich. You came to our tribe a pauper. Tell us where you put your money and we let you go", they gave him their word, so he did. When Suhaib met the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.), this verse was revealed, so the Prophet (s.a.w.) said: "O Abu Yahya the trade goods the highest profit, then recited the verse".

When Hisham Bin Ammer al-Ansari was killed in a battle, some denied his doing. But Umar Bin al-Khattab, Abu Huraira and others replied by reciting this Verse too. Ibn 'Abbas said: "They sold their lives to Allah by fighting for Him to death".

l Allah says: "Therefore fight for the cause of Allah. You are accountable for none but yourself." This verse is directed to the Prophet (s.a.w.), urging him to fight for the cause of Allah even if he was alone in this cause. It is said that, Abu Isaac once asked al-Bara'a Bin Azeb "A man fights a thousand of enemies, then he is killed. Is he one of those whom Allah says about: "and do not cast yourselves into destruction", al-Bara'a said: "No, let him fight to death, Allah says to his Prophet (s.a.w.): 'Therefore fight for the cause of Allah. You are accountable for none but yourself'."

Other evidences from Hadith

l It is narrated by Ibn Mas'ud that the Prophet (s.a.w.) said: "Allah is amazed by two men... he mentioned.. And a man fights for the cause of Allah, his companions run away, but he knew what the runaway fighter gets and what the one who stands firm and fights gets. So he went back and kept fighting to death. Allah says to his Angels: "O, behold my slave, he went back to fight to death hoping to get what I have 'Paradise' and fearing what I have 'Hell'." [Ahmad, Ibn Haiyan & Abu Da'wood]

l It is narrated by Anas Bin Malik that, the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.) and seven of the Ansar faced a large number of Quraishes on the Battle of Uhud. He said: "the one who can fight them will be rewarded with Paradise or will be my friend in Paradise". One of the Ansar began to fight to death and so on till the seven were dead. The prophet (s.a.w.) said: "Our companions were not just with us - meaning that they have got paradise and left them alive". [Muslim]

l It is narrated by Abu Baker Bin Abi Musa, he said: I heard Abu Huraira saying while facing the enemies: "the prophet (s.a.w.) said: 'The doors of Heaven are opened through Jihad'. A poor man asked: 'you heard the prophet (s.a.w.) saying that?' Abu Huraira said: 'yes'. The man went to his companions, said: peace be upon you, broke the sheath of his sword and fought to death". [Muslim]

l The prophet (s.a.w.) in the Battle of Badr said: "fight to get a Heavens-Earth-width Paradise". Umair Bin al-Hamam said: 'Is it a Heavens-Earth-width Paradise?' The prophet said: "yes". Umair said: 'Oh... Oh...', "why you say Oh... Oh...?" The prophet (s.a.w.) asked. Umair replied: 'by Allah, it is only the wish to be of its inhabitants'. The prophet (s.a.w.) said: 'you are'. Umair took some dates to eat, but he thought if he is going to eat the dates it will be a long time between him and Paradise, so he threw them away and fought to death". [Muslim]

l In Yamama's Day, when Hanifa tribe made their castle inaccessible to the Muslims, Al-Bara'a Bin Malek asked Muslims to put him in the leather shield and throw him to the enemy. He fought them alone and opened the gate for his brothers.

The Ijtehad of Muslim Scholars

l AL-HANAFIYA: It is Islamically right (Ja'eiz). Al-jassas said: "Mohammed Bin al-Hasan Al-Shaibani said: 'If a Muslim fought a thousand of the unbelievers with the intention to gain Allah's contentment (hurting the enemy or encouraging the other Muslims) it is right and he will be rewarded, Allah willing. Otherwise, it will be Islamically void, useless and pointless."

l AL-MALEKIYA: In Khalil's and al-Dardir's "It is Islamic for a Muslim to fight many of the unbeliever alone, if he does this for the cause of Allah". al-Dasuki said: "We can say that it is Islamic for a Muslim to fight many unbelievers alone with two conditions;

a- He does it for the cause of Allah.

b- He is sure that he will hurt them (if not there is unpreferability- Karahiya)."

l Al-Qurtubi said in his interpretation: Al-Kasem Bin Mukhaimara said: 'It is allowed to fight the enemy alone if you seek Al-Shahada (Martyrdom) and you are strong enough to do it. This is obvious in the Qur'an 'Some people would give away their lives to gain Allah's contentment'."

l Ibn Khuwaiz Mindad said: there are two situations in which a Muslim can fight the enemy alone:

a- If he is sure that he will hurt the enemy and survive.

b- If he is sure that he will hurt the enemy but he will be killed.

l Ibn Taimiyyah said in his Fatawa 540/28 "Muslim narrated in his Sahih, the story of Al-ukhdud (the furrow, which the Prophet (s.a.w.) told to his companions) in which "a young Muslim contributed himself for the cause of Allah". That is why the four Scholars said that, it is right for a Muslim to fight many unbelievers alone even if he thinks he will be killed.

l In Nayl Al Awtar, Al-Shawkani comments "when ten Muslims under the leadership of Asem Bin Thabet were sent by the prophet (s.a.w.) to a tribe to invite them to Islam, in the road they were surrounded by a hundred of the unbelievers. They fought strongly, seven of them killed, one of the three captive survivors feeling their deception, said: "by Allah I will not guide you to Muslims and I have a wonderful examples in front of me (meaning his killed brothers), they tried to force him guiding them, when they failed they killed him." This Hadith proves that, it is Islamically legitimate for a Muslim to fight the many enemy to death. On the other hand, it is permissible to accept to be a captive.

l Ibn Al-Arabi said about that, that it is right for four reasons:

a- Seeking for Martyrdom.

b- Hurting the enemy.

c- Encouraging Muslims.

d- Weakening the spirit of the enemy.

l In his Sunnan, Al-Baihaqi said: Al-Shafie said: there was a fight in front of the prophet (s.a.w.), one of the Ansar fought until he was killed by a group of the unbelievers after being told by the prophet (s.a.w.) about the rewards of his doing.

l Al-Nawawi said about the story of Umair Bin Hammam "it is Islamically right to fight the many unbelievers alone seeking Martyrdom, and there is no unpreferability about that according to the majority of Muslim Scholars".

l Al-Hafez Bin Hajr said: "It is Islamically right, if there are Islamic and good objective behind his doing such as; frightening and hurting the enemy, encouraging the Muslims".

Conclusion

Through the above evidences from the Qur'an and the Sunnah, it is clearly demostrated that the "Islamic-bombing-assault" or the "martyrdom attack" is Islamically legitimate as far as it is within the framework of Islam.

Prepared By Br. Abu Ruqaiyah, Translated by Br. Hussein El-Chamy


Taken from Nidaul Islam

------------------------------------------------
A question to a scholar;

Are suicide bombings as carried out by Hamas in Palestine permissible, when carried out in public places where civilians are certain to be killed. Do suicide bombers attain shahadah?
>> http://www.islam.tc/ask-imam/view.php?q=306



These are some articles concerning the 'topic' raised by myself. I am sorry if this is wrong or incorrect of me to do, but we should look at 'all' the opinons concerning the 'operations' by the people of palestine and accross the world.

These are some words from a brother, who told me and i have remembered it, for it is 'very' true;

--------------------------------------------
Dear brothers and sisters,

If we are unsure about something, we should remain quiet. It is NOT suicide bombing, which is a term invented by the same Zionists who call shooting bullets in the heads of children "a calculated response". As Muslims, we should use our own terms. Suicide is an act taken by a person who acts in despair of Allah, His Mercy and His Qadr, not by one who sacrifices his/her soul for the Sake of Allah. Please REFRAIN from using the word suicide if you do not know what it means, until you get knowledge.

-------------------------------------------

I hope i have helped in some way, if i have made any mistakes, plz do correct me and i hope i have given the true 'meaning' of martyrdom operations with the scholars of islam.


Sadiq!
(p.s. sorry sister for replying, but i do not want something that is not true become true and i dont want 'people' to jump to conclusions without hearing the scholars, salam sis)

TAKE caRE All!!

Netcurtains
17-02-2002, 22:30
REPENT REPENT REPENT
Turn to G_d and repent of violence

Lulua
03-03-2002, 07:03
Assalaamu alaikum ya muslimeen.

Greetings and good day to all.

Respectfully, dear brother seekeroftruth, I have read and heard the many fatawas regarding permissiveness and even promotion of the 'suicide missions' (or, as some like to refer to as 'martyrdom missions') not only right and permissable, but even recommendable. Yet...on the other hand there are just as many, if not more, fatawas by many respected scholars prohibiting and disclaiming such missions as not only wrong, but haram. So...you can see the see-saw effect of this alone.

As well, taking into logical account the reactions produced by such missions, as well as the physical effects of such missions...evidence goes to show their total ineffectuality. Once in a while there are several if not perhaps occasionaly dozens of Israelis injured or killed with such missions. But...more often than not, there are very few if any casualties from the effect of such missions. Upon going in on such a mission, the individual opting to take his/her own life in the mission is going in with the knowledge of not only damaging but killing himself/herself...along with the non-reassurance of killing or damaging that of their enemy. There is a great question if they will even reach any of their enemy target on their mission. Many times they do not. As well, there is the greatest possibility and even factuality to the effect that when and if they reach their 'enemy target', they are, in fact, taking down with them innocent civilians, and not those of army personnel. This is not a point of determination in the permissability of war in Islam.

Many people have argued and continue to argue with me on my stance and arguments on this point. But still...I like to refer to the history of Islam, and to the example set for us by our muslim predecessors...those first muslims of the beginning of the Islamic age. While they were still in Makkah, before migrating to Madinah, the muslims were severely and many times fatally persecuted. The prophet (SAAW) himself is reported to have walked by on occasion, witnessing the persecution of his own companions. And for those whom he did not personally witness from time to time, he was knowledgable about their sufferings. But he had no power with himself or his companions to physically fight such persecution. He merely persevered, and could only encourage his companions to have faith and persever themselves, reminding them that they would find great reward eventually in paradise for their perseverence and sufferings in the cause of Allah. This is a great lesson that we can use for example. Those brave companions and contemporaries of the prophet(SAAW) in the early days of Islam did not consider to resort to any sort of 'suicide mission', but rather peacefully and sumissively resorted to their fate of the persecution and oppression that they suffered at the hands of the Quraish. Nor did the prophet(SAAW) recommend or support any idea to do such a thing as a 'suicide mission'. Then...how can such a mission be acceptable today if it was not acceptable in the times of our beloved prophet(SAAW)?

Surely...he was the wisest of all the muslims of all ages, for he was our 'excellent exempler'...and his companions and contemporaries and their followers also the best example that we can look to for inspiration.

It is a terribly sad situation that muslims are in today, many times 'using' Islam as an excuse for this or that...without truly resorting to Islam for guidance in all aspects of our lives.

This is surely not in defense of the Israeli occupation nor their reaction to the Palestinian resistance. But...if the resistance were to take another step in their actual resistance, rather than the procession and continuance of the 'suicide missions'...then perhaps they will eventually be not only guided, but directed and protected as well by Allah to an effect which will not only benefit them, but will be pleasing and appealing to them.

This ongoing torment and torture and occupation has been going on now for 50 years. Surely...if their path they have taken was right..then they would have achieved some level of sucess by now. But yet they only serve to plunge themselves deeper into the abiss of ongoing fighting and torture and torment.

Perhaps it is a time to begin to change the strategy a bit. Surely, it could not hurt them more.

Lulua.

Sadiq
03-03-2002, 21:30
Salam sister in islam, now i know there are different opinons regarding this. Now i would like you to read these opinons of the past scholars, who have allowed BUT with conditions. Please to read it...

--------------


Al-Hakim has extracted in the Book of Tafseer (2/275) and Ibn Abi Hatim (1/128), with a similar narration recorded by Ibn `Asakir, that Bara' was asked about the verse (meaning), "And spend in the Path of Allah, and do not contribute to your own destruction..."; does it refer to a man who encounters the enemy and fights until he is killed? He said, "No, rather it is a man who commits a sin, and then says Allah will not forgive him." Al-Hakim said this is authentic according to Bukhari's and Muslim's criteria. This explanation of the verse was narrated by Tabari in his exegesis (3/584) from Hudhayfah, Ibn `Abbas, `Ikrimah, Hasan Basri, `Ata', Sa`id ibn Jubayr, Dahhak, Suddi, Muqatil and others.




Qurtubi says in his Tafseer (2/364), "Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Shaybani, the student of Abu Hanifah, said: If a man single-handedly attacks 1,000 pagans, there is no objection to it if there is hope of success, or inflicting loss on the enemy, otherwise it is disliked, for then he would expose himself to death without benefit to the Muslims. As for someone whose aim is to embolden the Muslims to emulate his feat, it's permissibility is not far-fetched, for it entails benefit to the Muslims in some ways. if his intent is to frighten the enemy, and demonstrate the Muslims' strength of faith, its permissibility is not far-fetched. If there is benefit in it for the Muslims, then giving one's life for the strengthening of the religion and weakening of the unbelievers, then it is the noble rank praised in the verse, (meaning), "Among mankind is he who sells himself seeking the pleasure of Allah." and other verses."

----------------

Now sister, below i have found the opinons of the madhabs, regarding this;

Hanafi

Ibn `Abideen says in his Hashiyah (4/303), "There is no objection to a man fighting alone, even if he thinks he will be killed, provided he achieves something such as killing, wounding or defeating [the enemy], for this has been reported from a number of the Sahabah in the presence of the Messenger of Allah on the Day of Uhud, and he praised them for it. If, however, he knows he will not inflict any loss on them, it is not permissible for him to attack, for it would not contribute to the strengthening of the religion."


Maliki

Ibn Khuwayz-Mandad said, as cited by Qurtubi in his Tafseer (2/364), "As for a man single-handedly attacking 100 or more enemy troops ... this has two scenarios: If he is certain, or reasonably so, that he will kill the subject of his attack, and emerge safe, then it is good, and similarly if he is reasonably certain that he will be killed, but will inflict loss or cause damage, or have a beneficial effect for the Muslims, then it is permissible also." Statements from Qurtubi and Ibn al-`Arabi have already preceded.


Hanbali

Ibn Qudamah says in Al-Mughni (9/309),
"If the enemy is more than twice the Muslims' number, and the Muslims are reasonably certain of victory, then it is preferable to remain steadfast on account of the benefit [involved], but if they turn back it is permissible, for they are not immune to destruction ... it is conceivable that they are obliged to stand fast if they are reasonably certain of victory, on account of the benefit, but if they are reasonably certain or being defeated by remaining and being unscathed by turning back, then it is preferable for them to turn back, but if they remain put, it is permissible, for they have a goal of martyrdom, and it is also possible that they will be victorious. If they are reasonably certain of being routed whether they remain put or turn back, then it is preferable for them to remain steadfast to attain the rank or martyrdom, ... and also because it is possible they might be victorious."


Ibn Taymiyyah says, in Majmu` al-Fatawa (28/540),

"Muslim has narrated in his Sahih the story of the people of the trenches, in which the boy ordered his own killing for the benefit of the religion, and hence the four imams have allowed a Muslim to immerse himself in the enemy ranks, even if he is reasonably certain that they will kill him, provided there is benefit in that for the Muslims. "


Zahiri

Ibn Hazm says in Al-Muhalla (7/294), "Neither Abu Ayyub al-Ansari nor Abu Musa al-Ash`ari criticized a man plunging alone into a raging army and remaining steadfast until he was killed... It has been authentically reported that a man from among the Sahabah asked the Messenger of Allah about what makes Allah laugh upon a servant, and he said, "His immersing himself into the enemy without armour," whereupon the man removed his armour and entered the enemy [ranks, fighting] until he was killed."

-------------------

The majority of scholars gave conditions for the permissibility:


1. Intention
2. Infliction of losses on the enemy
3. Frightening them
4. Strengthening the hearts of the Muslims

-----------------

Now this is from one of the renowned exegetes regarding the verse that is used to say that it will only cause destruction to oneself.

Ibn al-`Arabi says in Ahkam al-Qur'an (1/116, and see also Qurtubi's tafseer 2/364), commenting on the verse, (meaning), "And spend in the Path of Allah, and do not contribute to your own destruction...," "There are five views about [the meaning of] destruction [here]:
·Do not give up spending [in the path of Allah]
·Do not go out without provision
·Do not abandon Jihad
·Do not take on an enemy you are not capable of withstanding
·Do not despair of forgiveness

-----------------------------

I end this by pasted what a brother said about this issue;

Qurtubi and Ibn Qudamah allowed plunging into the enemy with only a sincere intention, even if no other conditions are fulfilled, for seeking martyrdom is legitimate. Since there is no explicit stipulation of the majority's conditions in narrations, this view appears preferable. The majority deduced their conditions from general standards of the Shari`ah, but the general need not restrict the specific. Yes, we do say that if there is no benefit to the Muslims or the Mujahideen, an action should not be carried out, and is not the most optimal practice, but this is apart from the original permissibility of the act, for to condemn one seeking martyrdom without a firm basis is an injustice.

I hope this issue is researched with the upmost respect. Now i leave with the opinon of the hanafi scholar, which explains and corrects this issue.

>>>

Ibn `Abideen says in his Hashiyah (4/303), "There is no objection to a man fighting alone, even if he thinks he will be killed, provided he achieves something such as killing, wounding or defeating [the enemy], for this has been reported from a number of the Sahabah in the presence of the Messenger of Allah on the Day of Uhud, and he praised them for it. If, however, he knows he will not inflict any loss on them, it is not permissible for him to attack, for it would not contribute to the strengthening of the religion."

>>

Salam to all! And dear sister, read the opinons of the past scholars and scholars of this time, both are helpful to any person. And many scholars have held the above opinon.

SadiQ!

>Assalaamu alaikum ya muslimeen.
>
>Greetings and good day to all.
>
>
>Respectfully, dear brother seekeroftruth, I have
>read and heard the many
>fatawas regarding permissiveness and even
>promotion of the 'suicide missions'
>(or, as some like to
>refer to as 'martyrdom missions')
>not only right and permissable,
>but even recommendable. Yet...on the
>other hand there are just
>as many, if not more,
>fatawas by many respected scholars
>prohibiting and disclaiming such missions
>as not only wrong, but
>haram. So...you can see the
>see-saw effect of this alone.
>
>
>As well, taking into logical account
>the reactions produced by such
>missions, as well as the
>physical effects of such missions...evidence
>goes to show their total
>ineffectuality. Once in a while
>there are several if not
>perhaps occasionaly dozens of Israelis
>injured or killed with such
>missions. But...more often than not,
>there are very few if
>any casualties from the effect
>of such missions. Upon going
>in on such a mission,
>the individual opting to take
>his/her own life in the
>mission is going in with
>the knowledge of not only
>damaging but killing himself/herself...along with
>the non-reassurance of killing or
>damaging that of their enemy.
>There is a great question
>if they will even reach
>any of their enemy target
>on their mission. Many times
>they do not. As well,
>there is the greatest possibility
>and even factuality to the
>effect that when and if
>they reach their 'enemy target',
>they are, in fact, taking
>down with them innocent civilians,
>and not those of army
>personnel. This is not a
>point of determination in the
>permissability of war in Islam.
>
>
>Many people have argued and continue
>to argue with me on
>my stance and arguments on
>this point. But still...I like
>to refer to the history
>of Islam, and to the
>example set for us by
>our muslim predecessors...those first muslims
>of the beginning of the
>Islamic age. While they were
>still in Makkah, before migrating
>to Madinah, the muslims were
>severely and many times fatally
>persecuted. The prophet (SAAW) himself
>is reported to have walked
>by on occasion, witnessing the
>persecution of his own companions.
>And for those whom he
>did not personally witness from
>time to time, he was
>knowledgable about their sufferings. But
>he had no power with
>himself or his companions to
>physically fight such persecution. He
>merely persevered, and could only
>encourage his companions to have
>faith and persever themselves, reminding
>them that they would find
>great reward eventually in paradise
>for their perseverence and sufferings
>in the cause of Allah.
>This is a great lesson
>that we can use for
>example. Those brave companions and
>contemporaries of the prophet(SAAW) in
>the early days of Islam
>did not consider to resort
>to any sort of 'suicide
>mission', but rather peacefully and
>sumissively resorted to their fate
>of the persecution and oppression
>that they suffered at the
>hands of the Quraish. Nor
>did the prophet(SAAW) recommend or
>support any idea to do
>such a thing as a
>'suicide mission'. Then...how can such
>a mission be acceptable today
>if it was not acceptable
>in the times of our
>beloved prophet(SAAW)?
>
>Surely...he was the wisest of all
>the muslims of all ages,
>for he was our 'excellent
>exempler'...and his companions and contemporaries
>and their followers also the
>best example that we can
>look to for inspiration.
>
>It is a terribly sad situation
>that muslims are in today,
>many times 'using' Islam as
>an excuse for this or
>that...without truly resorting to Islam
>for guidance in all aspects
>of our lives.
>
>This is surely not in defense
>of the Israeli occupation nor
>their reaction to the Palestinian
>resistance. But...if the resistance were
>to take another step in
>their actual resistance, rather than
>the procession and continuance of
>the 'suicide missions'...then perhaps they
>will eventually be not only
>guided, but directed and protected
>as well by Allah to
>an effect which will not
>only benefit them, but will
>be pleasing and appealing to
>them.
>
>This ongoing torment and torture and
>occupation has been going on
>now for 50 years. Surely...if
>their path they have taken
>was right..then they would have
>achieved some level of sucess
>by now. But yet they
>only serve to plunge themselves
>deeper into the abiss of
>ongoing fighting and torture and
>torment.
>
>Perhaps it is a time to
>begin to change the strategy
>a bit. Surely, it could
>not hurt them more.
>
>Lulua.


Sadiq!
-------------------------------
"Oh Allah, enrich me with knowledge, adorn me with gentleness, honour me with piety and beautify me with health", Aameen