PDA

View Full Version : Partial Implementation of Islam


Ibrahim
17-03-2001, 01:01
LAST EDITED ON 17-03-01 AT 00:03 AM (GMT)[p]IT IS HARAM TO CALL FOR THE PARTIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF ISLAM

On the 13th of January Interior Minister Moinuddin Haider said that the constitution would be amended to make the Quran and Sunnah the supreme law. Furthermore, on the 15th of January 2001, Federal Minister for Religious Affairs Dr Mahmood Ghazi said, "the government is actively considering to review more than 5,500 existing laws to make these in consonance with Islamic traditions and values". Both of these statements clearly illustrate that all previous attempts made by former governments, be they military or civil at introducing pieces of Islamic legislation were not enough to appease the ummah. Thus the current government is embarking upon a fresh set of measures designed to pacify the ummah; beginning with promulgation of the riba law, followed by a decision to review some laws. Our history in "Islamisation" should have taught us by now that changing individual laws within the kufr system does not deliver an Islamic State but only helps to prolong the rule of kufr in Muslim lands

Today, with the aid of the kafir colonialist powers all the regimes in the Islamic world are implementing systems of kufr upon the ummah by force. These kufr systems have been adopted from the west and are capitalist in their nature. They are built upon a secular creed, which advocates the separation of religion from life. As a result, the regimes in our countries at the behest of the kuffar actively work to separate Islam from temporal matters by confining it to mosques and individual ibadaat. So whenever the ummah manifests her desire to be ruled by Islam, the kuffar instruct their agents to deal with the ummah either through appeasement or severity of the law. Appeasement involves making the regime look Islamic, by making a few cosmetic changes, but in essence the kufr system remains unchanged. The method of pacifying the ummah may vary from country to country. In some Muslim countries such as Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia the regime directly takes it upon itself to implement a few Islamic laws such as cutting the hand of the thief, prohibiting alcohol, stoning the adulterer etc. In other Muslim countries such as Egypt and Jordan the regime invites 'Islamists' into government to make a few superficial changes. As a consequence of gradual implementation of Islam, the kuffar in collaboration with our rulers have led the ummah to believe that the complete implementation of Islam is improbable and at best she should be content with some Islam rather than none at all. Severity of the law is invoked when efforts to mollify the ummah fail and the regime believes that the very existence of the kufr system it protects is under threat. This happened to Muslims of Algeria who had to face the onslaught of their brutal regime, despite securing 80% of the votes to implement Islam. So it should be clear that the kufr systems are obstacles to the implementation of Islam and the kuffar will spare no effort in making Islam far removed from our life's affairs.

Islam forbids Muslims to engage in the partial implementation of Islam whether in government or otherwise. This is because such actions consent to the mixing of kufr laws with a few Islamic laws and at the same time ignores the implementation of a multitude of Islamic laws. Allah (swt) warns us in Surah al-Baqarah,

"Then is it only a part of the Book that you believe in, and do you deny a part? What is the reward for those among you who do so, except disgrace in this life? And on the Day of judgement they shall be consigned to the most grievous penalty". [TMQ Al-Baqarah]

Furthermore, the seerah of the Prophet (saw) indicates that he (saw) always implemented all of the shariah that had been revealed to him (saw), and he (saw) never postponed implementation of even a single order from Allah (swt)

Implementing Islam is not about changing individual laws or about reviewing 5500 laws, but it is about the system that produces these laws. Unless the kufr systems are removed from our lands, Islam will never be able to flourish. Demolishing these systems of kufr and replacing them with the Khilafah, will ensure that Islam is applied immediately and comprehensively. Only then can the Quran and the Sunnah rule not only Muslims but also the whole of mankind. Allah (swt) says in Surah al-Nisa,

"Verily, we have revealed to you the book in truth so that you may rule between mankind by what Allah has shown you". [TMQ An-Nisa]


Hizb ut-Tahrir
Pakistan
2nd February 2001

Source: [link:www.khilafah.com|Khilafah Magazine, February Issue]

Om_Mohammed
18-03-2001, 08:39
Assalaamu alaikum.

Interesting, really, br. Ibrahim. But, please tell me this. What do you do, on an individual basis...when you would really like and desire truly to wholly implement the true islamic form of government and therefore life...yet you personally and individually have no political power? What does an individual do in that case? I mean...the individuals in society, no matter where we live...have little to no power to sway those who do have the seats of power. What do we do? Or...what CAN we do?

Om Mohammed.

Ibrahim
23-03-2001, 10:05
as-salaamu aleikum,

Sis, this in fact is the heart of the issue. As individuals we *cannot* change society. Individuals can change individuals, but onyl groups can change societies. In order to change society we need to form a group, in response to the ayah: "Let there arise from among you a group(s), calling to al-Khyr...".

Indeed our work is a work of politics, but not the politics of the kuffar. We must not become enmeshed in their system, assisting them in their legislations, as only Allah (swt) is the legislator. Instead we should work to awaken the Muslims to the kufr that surrounds them, and to act as a catalyst to incite them to demand that they be ruled by Islam. Also we must seek the help (nusrah) of the influential amongst society (not kuffar, only Muslims), as the prophet (saw) did, he approached over 40 different tribes during his work in Makkah, yet never ocne did he show even a hint of compromise or a willingness to adopt their system in return for their help. His goal was the pure implementation of Islam, and so should ours be.

Ibrahim.

Luque (Guest)
23-08-2001, 09:15
Assalamualaikum

The answer for the only true or pure Islam is with Allah. Many of us can interpret Qur'an and Hadith in many ways. Which one is the true interpretation? Allah knows.

We have to accept the fact that Islam today is also like Christianity, has been interpreted in many ways with many group of followers.

Christianity has orthodox and protestants. Also in Islam. Only we still do not want to accept that fact. The fact remains.

Kamal Antartuk interpret Islam not the same as Ayatollah Khomeini. You interpret it not the same as mine. But only Allah knows who has the correct interpretation. As the time it is, let's live in harmony with our own interpretation without forcing others or accusing others as Kufr.

This is the way we should live as surah Al Kafirun.

Luque

Ibrahim (Guest)
23-08-2001, 12:55
Luque,

there's something seriously wrong with your thinking.

You actually believe kemal utterjerk 'interpreted' Islam?

Tell me Luque, in Islam we are commanded to stone the adulterers and to cut the hands of thieves... how do you propose in your new "each to their own interpretation" of Islam to deal with this issue?

Ibrahim.

Lulua
01-09-2001, 17:01
Assalaamu alaikum.

Hehe...that's great, br. Ibrahim...utterjerk.

Well, for reminder to all those who know little of their Islamic history...'Attaturk' (or better named utterjerk by Br. Ibrahim)...along with his supporters and followers was responsible for the demise of the islamic state known as khilafah. This was at the discretion and imminent instruction and under the supervision of the kufar regimes, due to the many temptations and fringe benefits they made available to the 'muslims' of that time. It only goes to show the weakness in faith of those 'muslims'. For...if they would have been strong in faith, they would have been able to ward off such and any other temptations offered to them, and we would still have a single united state of khilafah of a united muslim nation, rather than the divided and fighting and separate states that we are left with today.

Have you ever heard of the arabic phrase 'Allah ghani'? Although it can be literally interpreted to mean that Allah is rich...which is of course quite true...it also means and infers that Allah is not needing of such a state of affairs, and that we would be better off with something else. Quite a potent phrase for only two simple words. This is the response of muslims to the current state of affairs of the muslim ummah: 'Allah ghani'. In other words, we would all be much better off if we were in a state of true khilafah...rather than the mess that we are in now, due to the steps taken by utterjerk and his comrades.

Surely, Allah is not in need of the interpretations of His word by the sort such as utterjerk and his followers, as well as those that have come after him.

I suggest, Luque, that you sincerely look into some books of tafseer of the Quran...in it you will find much in guidance not only from the Word of Allah, but as well of interpretations by those who are not only deserving to be regarded as interpreters of Quran, but who are qualified as interpreters...much better than you and I. In such books of tafseer, you will find the interpretations and understandings of the Word of Allah from those who were living during the time of it's revelation. It will reveal to you not only their interpretations of the verses, but as well how it is to be implemented, as well as revealings of the reasons and times of the revelation of those verses.

Lulua.