PDA

View Full Version : The New Badr, 9-11 And Layla Tul-Qadr


lubna
10-11-2004, 10:14
The New Badr, 9-11 And Layla Tul-Qadr


In the month of Ramadan, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) with his army of 300 soldiers, poorly equipped, defeated the arrogant infidel army of 1000. History seems to be repeating itself once again. It is the month of Ramadan; once again handful of Muslim soldiers (Mujahideen) poorly equipped and trained, fighting an arrogant infidel army. Even the ratios are similar i.e. 3 to 1; the US army with the handful of Iraqi apostates numbering about 20,000 battling against 6000 brave Mujahideen.

The similarities with the battle of Badr is obvious when you consider two factors:

a) The relative strength of the US army is far greater than the pagan Arab army had over the Muslims.

b) At the time of Badr, the Muslims did not have the treacherous elements within as an organized unit engaged in sedition. It was later that they crystallized as the infamous Munaifqeen (hypocrites) movement.

Given the facts, everyone will be wondering and hoping if the outcome of today’s Badr in Fallujah will be the same as the Badr of yesterday. Battles can be won and lost but nations become truly defeated when its hearts and minds are subdued and they begin to question their identity and values that culminate in adopting the agenda of their conquerors. So, the neo-crusaders, apostate-collaborators, insidious moderates and ignorant moderates attempt to convince the Muslim Ummah that we have misinterpreted Islam after centuries and that Islam is perfectly compatible with Western capitalism and its values.

On the first point, if Islam is ‘compatible’ with the capitalism of the neo-crusaders as they claim, which is driven by their carnal instinct of profit maximization with its pretence of upholding democracy, freedom and the rule of law, would they be prepared to contemplate implementing Islamic law (Sharia) in their own lands? Similarly, the moderates should ask if Islam is compatible with capitalism of the West, then what makes Islam so distinct?

Today we hear Tony Blair, Bush and Allawi acting in the name of the Iraqi people, when the Iraqis have not authorized them in anyway. They came for WMD and Saddam. They now have both so what are they here for then? Surely if the insurgents and the so-called foreign fighters are really not welcomed by the Iraqis they are more than capable of driving them out. In fact, how could the Iraqi resistance function without the support of the Iraqi masses? The matter of elections if Iraq is to be a true democracy and independent is an internal matter for the Iraqis to decide; instead it is being directed at the barrel of the gun with the sole aim of ‘legitimizing’ the apostate puppet, Allawi.

The invaders are the real terrorists, criminals and as the casualty figures emerges coupled with the incidences like Abu-Ghraib proved beyond any doubt that they are the sadistic-satanic-mass-murderers. Their powerbase in the US are the Christian fundamentalist. They have endorsed Bush thereby also endorsed his crimes of rape, murder, theft, and other depraved satanic practices that are becoming so common within the US. Such acts are being committed against a nation that has never attacked the US.

Yet, these brainwashed Bible thumpers wrap the conduct of their nation with the so-called ‘love’ of Christ lecturing everyone else to turn the other cheeks while they continue to deliver the slaps and loot the wealth of other nations. These Christian fundamentalists must either be ignorant of the facts, which is inexcusable given that we live in an era of information, or they are endorsing the path of Satan. Like the medieval crusaders, they are blood thirsty and full of hate.

So, their soldiers wearing the cross, full of hate, shoot into unarmed civilians, singing “"Burn, you mother-f.. Burn". In contrast when the Mujahideen retaliate they praise their creator (Allah Akbar). Only occasionally they exhibit anger due to the loss of their loved ones but rarely show hatred. Hateful words like ‘rag head’, ‘sand nigger’, ‘towel heads’ have no equivalence within the tolerant Muslim societies.

As for treachery, this is talking place on a grand scale. The regimes in the neighboring Muslim countries are all mute; some are simply interested in preserving their personal interests, while others are forced to keep quiet as everyone knows of their shameful criminal complicity with the Americans in this carnage. If Arab nationalism had any substance or adherence it would have surfaced by now. Instead they are ready to share the dead carcasses of Iraq with the Judeo-Christian vultures, but like hyenas, they must wait for the time when they are given the crumbs in return for their servitude!

Inside Iraq, the Shia Ulemas (scholars) like Sistani and the Kurdish leaders driven by their narrow tribal, sectarian and self-centered interests are collaborating with the Americans. They cannot see the ethos of ‘divide and conquer’ at play. But when the boat sinks it will be too late. Remember how the Arabs collaborated with the British against the Othmania Khilafah? The loss of Palestine was the direct consequence of that treachery. You will always lose if you attempt to make a pact with the devil.

Then there are the moderate brigades with their notion of portraying the positive ‘Islamic’ image. This image is not constructed through the actions of the Muslims. This is being construed entirely by the predatory western powers with an agenda to subdue Islam. So to attain a positive image you must comply with their ideals and values. For example, we see treacherous apostates like the obscure Somali women in Holland or the lesbian in Canada, or the shameless harlot from Bangladesh feeding on the prejudices of the infidels getting maximum publicity and awards whilst the hundreds of women embracing Islam are ignored.

Similarily, how can you expect the Iraqi resistance to attain a positive image from the very people that they are fighting? Moreover the Muslims are the victims so why should they be compelled to show restraint and compassion? This is often cited by the moderates so that they can feel comfortable in the West; pose for pictures with the likes of the mass murderer like Tony Blair and George Bush, attending Iftar parties while Western armies are pillaging our lands and of course maintaining their much appreciated financial grants.

Islam gives the right to retaliate and makes it obligatory to defend ones homeland. Our actions are not driven by how the insidious non-Muslim regimes will construe our image but we should simply act according to the dictates of Islam and speak the truth. This is what is demanded of the Muslims.

Today is Layla Tul-Qadr or the Night of Power. Curiously,today is also 9-11 on the calendar. We as Muslims are obliged to support our Mujahideen; we should pray for their victory - they are our boys! Our boys are those who bow down towards Mecca not towards the Bars and the Clubs. It is our obligation to be with the camp of the believers and fight the belligerent infidels and their treacherous apostates. We should feel sorrow for the loss of our Mujahideen and the destruction of their homes and families. We should feel contempt and disgust towards the infidel army who have already shown by their conduct that they are worse than animals. Find me a Mujahid that is a homosexual, a junkie, a necrophilia, a rapist, a sodomite, a thief, a sadistic murderer that kills not in retaliation or self-defense but propelled by their inner Nazi like hate. And most importantly, we should support their efforts with what ever means we have available as our brothers and sisters of "La Ilaha ha Ila Allah".

Copyright © 2004 by Yamin Zakaria and published exclusively by Jihad Unspun. All rights are reserved.

ginap
12-11-2004, 02:25
Allawi may change his political position since his cousin Ghazi Allawi, his cousin's wife and daughter in law were taken hostage by Ansar al-Jihad in the last few days. When it becomes personal world leaders tend to change their position.

Deathpasser
13-11-2004, 03:47
Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Baraktu ya Muslimeen
Greetings everyone else



Yamin Zakaria, isn't that person from Al-Muhaajiroun.
Can someone give me the link to this person's website and al-muhaajirouns website.

lubna
16-11-2004, 11:57
Assalamoalykum brother deathpasser

i asked brother yamin and he told me that he is not from al muhajiroon and never have been.
here is the link to his own site.

www.cdlr.net

wassalam

lubna

Zainab
16-11-2004, 17:55
AA :)

This might be a little off-topic :p but please sis lubna could you tell me whre you got ''You may deceive all the people part of the time, and part of the people all the time, but not all the people all the time.'' from? :confused:

Jazakallah :D

AH

Zainab ;)
xxxxxxxxxx

PS. I hope everyone had a happy eid :)

wildlifer
17-11-2004, 07:44
So, their soldiers wearing the cross, full of hate, shoot into unarmed civilians, singing “"Burn, you mother-f.. Burn". In contrast when the Mujahideen retaliate they praise their creator (Allah Akbar). Only occasionally they exhibit anger due to the loss of their loved ones but rarely show hatred. Hateful words like ‘rag head’, ‘sand nigger’, ‘towel heads’ have no equivalence within the tolerant Muslim societies.


What a joke. Apostate, Kaffir have the same meanings. A "good" Muslim wouldn't dine with either. Tolerance ... yeah, right. There are ethnocentric bigots everywhere, regardless of religious teachings. For Zakaria to state such is either pure ignorance or intellectual dishonesty.
BTW, The ratio of "cross-wearing" Xtians to non-religious (non-fundamentalist) soldiers is probably about the same as the National ratio, or ~ .65 -.35. One also wonders how he heard these alleged cross-wearing soldiers singing "Burn, you mother-f.. Burn," and lived to tell the tale. Methinks he fabricated it out of whole clothe.

lubna
17-11-2004, 10:25
AA :)

This might be a little off-topic :p but please sis lubna could you tell me whre you got ''You may deceive all the people part of the time, and part of the people all the time, but not all the people all the time.'' from? :confused:


i got it from one of the site of ''qoutes from famous people'' long time ago and dont remember which one, but here is another qoute i like......

Wealth unused might as well not exist
--Aesop (~550 BC)

from the site,

http://home.att.net/~quotations/qoutations.html

Zainab
17-11-2004, 18:20
i got it from one of the site of ''qoutes from famous people'' long time ago and dont remember which one, but here is another qoute i like......

Wealth unused might as well not exist
--Aesop (~550 BC)

from the site,

http://home.att.net/~quotations/qoutations.html

Thank you. I found out it was actually Abraham Lincoln :p