lubna
22-07-2005, 13:57
-----Original Message-----
From: John Kaminski [mailto:skylax@...]
Sent: 21 July 2005 21:11
To: Tom Mysiewicz
Subject: Re: DIVIDE AND CONQUER!
Hi Tom,
We failed to catch them (the evil Zionist cabal) for doing 9/11. Now
the sky's really the limit. There's no place to hide. And it's stupid
to think they won't keep doing these things. Real Muslims don't have
anything to do with it. But a few fake ones are on the payroll, just
enough to start WW III.
Best wishes,
John K.
On Jul 21, 2005, at 8:52 PM, Tom Mysiewicz wrote:
> DIVIDE AND CONQUER!
>
> by
> Tom Mysiewicz
>
> The recent London terrorist acts--if actually conducted by
> authentic Islamicists--serve to drive a wedge between Christians and
> Muslims in that country. This at a time when public support for the
> war was breaking sharply in the U.K. Likewise the July 15th talk of
> Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo on WFLA-AM (Orlando, Fla.) about
> H-bombing Mecca and other holy Mulsim sites (in response to a
> hypothetical Islamic nuclear attack on the U.S.) undoubtedly serves to
> drive a wedge between Muslims and Christians.
> There is nothing new about the idea of bombing Mecca. It has
> been aired for years on Christian Zionist and neocon talk shows, but
> Tancredo's statement gives it more weight. And the technique has
> already been tried on a small scale with the destruction of Fallujah
> by U.S. forces, the birthplace of the Wahhabi Muslim sect some 200
> years earlier. (During the war phase of the conquest, the British
> "accidentally" dropped two "smart" bombs on Fallujah markets, causing
> heavy civilian casualties.)
> At the same time, the Neocon talk shows are floating the idea
> that Al Qaeda has "nukes" planted throughout the U.S. that they
> purchased with "Afghan opium money" from the former Soviet state.
> (The Taliban, strangely, had sharply curtailed drug
> production--strange if their guests wanted to use the "Hiroshima
> option" on the U.S.--but George Bush corrected this situation with
> the invasion!) This type of talk serves the "war party" well as it
> makes the hard-to-swallow believable to a large segment of the U.S.
> population...should it happen. Nuking the U.S. Islamic holy sites
> would lock all parties into a prolonged genocidal struggle--something
> war profiteers and extreme Zionists would not be sorry to see.
> ###
>
From: John Kaminski [mailto:skylax@...]
Sent: 21 July 2005 21:11
To: Tom Mysiewicz
Subject: Re: DIVIDE AND CONQUER!
Hi Tom,
We failed to catch them (the evil Zionist cabal) for doing 9/11. Now
the sky's really the limit. There's no place to hide. And it's stupid
to think they won't keep doing these things. Real Muslims don't have
anything to do with it. But a few fake ones are on the payroll, just
enough to start WW III.
Best wishes,
John K.
On Jul 21, 2005, at 8:52 PM, Tom Mysiewicz wrote:
> DIVIDE AND CONQUER!
>
> by
> Tom Mysiewicz
>
> The recent London terrorist acts--if actually conducted by
> authentic Islamicists--serve to drive a wedge between Christians and
> Muslims in that country. This at a time when public support for the
> war was breaking sharply in the U.K. Likewise the July 15th talk of
> Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo on WFLA-AM (Orlando, Fla.) about
> H-bombing Mecca and other holy Mulsim sites (in response to a
> hypothetical Islamic nuclear attack on the U.S.) undoubtedly serves to
> drive a wedge between Muslims and Christians.
> There is nothing new about the idea of bombing Mecca. It has
> been aired for years on Christian Zionist and neocon talk shows, but
> Tancredo's statement gives it more weight. And the technique has
> already been tried on a small scale with the destruction of Fallujah
> by U.S. forces, the birthplace of the Wahhabi Muslim sect some 200
> years earlier. (During the war phase of the conquest, the British
> "accidentally" dropped two "smart" bombs on Fallujah markets, causing
> heavy civilian casualties.)
> At the same time, the Neocon talk shows are floating the idea
> that Al Qaeda has "nukes" planted throughout the U.S. that they
> purchased with "Afghan opium money" from the former Soviet state.
> (The Taliban, strangely, had sharply curtailed drug
> production--strange if their guests wanted to use the "Hiroshima
> option" on the U.S.--but George Bush corrected this situation with
> the invasion!) This type of talk serves the "war party" well as it
> makes the hard-to-swallow believable to a large segment of the U.S.
> population...should it happen. Nuking the U.S. Islamic holy sites
> would lock all parties into a prolonged genocidal struggle--something
> war profiteers and extreme Zionists would not be sorry to see.
> ###
>