Anunga
17-08-2005, 12:10
Khazars (a people of Russian stock)
are a Majority among the various ethnic groups
who have invaded Palestine and the Gaza corridor
since the start of the last century.
Khazars claim the vicinity of Palestine to be their
traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland
***
DESPITE the fact that Khazars are NOT Semitik
and are more closely related to the
Peoples of ancient South-West-Central Asia
than to the Semitiks of the Middle East.
http://198.62.75.1/www2/koestler
http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/koestler.htm
http://www.ntimc.org/attachments/dec2004/iron_curtain_over_america1.pdf?PHPSESSID=d717018de 9d93eb88610b2c7df81d792
***
Was this Invasion, Domination and Occupation justified ?
For example:
If Chinese Catholics learn of Rome and the Vatican,
take on the ways and customs of Roman Catholics,
and then invade Italy, expel and dominate many Italians,
and claim Italy to be their
traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland,
with Rome as their capitol city,
would it be right ?
If Europeans learned of the Americas,
invaded in droves, claimed the Americas
to be their traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland,
through bizarre belief systems (e.g. "Mormons")
that portrayed them as the legitimate habitants,
and then totally dominated, subjegated
and classified Americans ("Indians")
with derogatory names (e.g. "Lamanites")
and encouraged Americans to drink, smoke and eat
plenty White Poison (alcohol, tobacco, sugar, etc)
was it right ?
If the English learned of Australia,
drunkenly stumbled ashore, claimed Australia
to be "Terra Nullis" and rightfully
a possession of their Queen or King,
and then totally dominated, subjegated
and classified Australians ("Aborigines")
as being more like Cave People
and not worthy of consideration,
and encouraged Australians to drink, smoke and eat
plenty White Poison (alcohol, tobacco, sugar, etc)
as a way of subtle GENOCIDE, was it right ?
If swarms of MILLIONS of Arabs came up from Arabika,
invaded ancient Judea and drove the Hebrew People
out of Judea, in total absolute horror of facing
the bloody sharpened blades of Abrams Jews,
and caused Hebrews to flee for their lives
to diverse places such as Greece and Iran
and many other lands, was it right ?
If a contagion of MILLIONS
of Communis Fascis Terroris Chinese
invaded Tibet, subjected the People of Tibet
to unspeakable horror, persecution and denegration,
caused many Tibetans to flee for their lives
to refugee areas in India and Nepal
and many other lands, was it right ?
If the Nordics of Sweeden, Norway and Finland
learn of the Great Apes in Central Afrika,
adapt the ways of the Great Apes as their own,
and then centuries later,
invade the jungles of Central Afrika,
drive the Great Apes out of the jungles
into the Sahara Desert, and then
claim Uganda and kindred Afrikan Heartlands as their
traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland
with Kampala or Entebbe as a spiritual capitol,
would it be right ?
If the Great Apes of Uganda, Rawanda and the Congo
learn of the Nordics, adapt the
ways of the Nordics as their own, and then
centuries later, invade the snowfields and fiords
of the Nordic lands, drive the Nordics
into the Arctic Circle and elsewhere,
and claim Nordica as their
traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland,
with Stockholm or Oslo or Helsinki as their
spiritual capitol,
would it be right ?
Is any invasion right no matter what LIES are used
to justify it ?
are a Majority among the various ethnic groups
who have invaded Palestine and the Gaza corridor
since the start of the last century.
Khazars claim the vicinity of Palestine to be their
traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland
***
DESPITE the fact that Khazars are NOT Semitik
and are more closely related to the
Peoples of ancient South-West-Central Asia
than to the Semitiks of the Middle East.
http://198.62.75.1/www2/koestler
http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/koestler.htm
http://www.ntimc.org/attachments/dec2004/iron_curtain_over_america1.pdf?PHPSESSID=d717018de 9d93eb88610b2c7df81d792
***
Was this Invasion, Domination and Occupation justified ?
For example:
If Chinese Catholics learn of Rome and the Vatican,
take on the ways and customs of Roman Catholics,
and then invade Italy, expel and dominate many Italians,
and claim Italy to be their
traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland,
with Rome as their capitol city,
would it be right ?
If Europeans learned of the Americas,
invaded in droves, claimed the Americas
to be their traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland,
through bizarre belief systems (e.g. "Mormons")
that portrayed them as the legitimate habitants,
and then totally dominated, subjegated
and classified Americans ("Indians")
with derogatory names (e.g. "Lamanites")
and encouraged Americans to drink, smoke and eat
plenty White Poison (alcohol, tobacco, sugar, etc)
was it right ?
If the English learned of Australia,
drunkenly stumbled ashore, claimed Australia
to be "Terra Nullis" and rightfully
a possession of their Queen or King,
and then totally dominated, subjegated
and classified Australians ("Aborigines")
as being more like Cave People
and not worthy of consideration,
and encouraged Australians to drink, smoke and eat
plenty White Poison (alcohol, tobacco, sugar, etc)
as a way of subtle GENOCIDE, was it right ?
If swarms of MILLIONS of Arabs came up from Arabika,
invaded ancient Judea and drove the Hebrew People
out of Judea, in total absolute horror of facing
the bloody sharpened blades of Abrams Jews,
and caused Hebrews to flee for their lives
to diverse places such as Greece and Iran
and many other lands, was it right ?
If a contagion of MILLIONS
of Communis Fascis Terroris Chinese
invaded Tibet, subjected the People of Tibet
to unspeakable horror, persecution and denegration,
caused many Tibetans to flee for their lives
to refugee areas in India and Nepal
and many other lands, was it right ?
If the Nordics of Sweeden, Norway and Finland
learn of the Great Apes in Central Afrika,
adapt the ways of the Great Apes as their own,
and then centuries later,
invade the jungles of Central Afrika,
drive the Great Apes out of the jungles
into the Sahara Desert, and then
claim Uganda and kindred Afrikan Heartlands as their
traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland
with Kampala or Entebbe as a spiritual capitol,
would it be right ?
If the Great Apes of Uganda, Rawanda and the Congo
learn of the Nordics, adapt the
ways of the Nordics as their own, and then
centuries later, invade the snowfields and fiords
of the Nordic lands, drive the Nordics
into the Arctic Circle and elsewhere,
and claim Nordica as their
traditional, ancestral and spiritual homeland,
with Stockholm or Oslo or Helsinki as their
spiritual capitol,
would it be right ?
Is any invasion right no matter what LIES are used
to justify it ?