Tayeb
21-07-2006, 13:54
s3 and greetings,
What's evident and most of people don't know is that what Israel is doing in Lebanon and Gaza is authorized by the jewish law. The jewish law says:
"....If one voluntarily stays in a city that is under siege, one has the status of a combatant.
The unintentional and undesirable killing of involuntarily remaining innocent civilians seems to this author to be the one "killing" activity which is permissible in Jewish law in war situations which would not be permissible in the pursuer/self-defense situations. Just like Jewish law permits one to send one's own soldiers out to combat (without their consent) to be perhaps killed, Jewish law would allow the unintentional killing of innocent civilians as a necessary (but undesired byproduct) of the moral license of war
source: http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/war3.html
Interestingly it considers an auhtorized war the war of conquest of territories:
"The king must first wage only obligatory wars. What is an obligatory war? It is a war against the seven nations, the war against Amalek, and a war to deliver Israel from an enemy who has attacked them. Then he may wage authorized wars, which is a war against others in order to enlarge the borders of Israel and to increase his greatness and prestige."
source: http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/war2.html
The site says that the usage of nuclear weapons is permissable:
The use of tactical (battlefield) nuclear weapons designed solely to be used on the field of battlefield would, in circumstances where the complete destruction of the combatants be permissible, (such as after the proper warning and peace seeking) would be acceptable.
Ma'a-salaama,
What's evident and most of people don't know is that what Israel is doing in Lebanon and Gaza is authorized by the jewish law. The jewish law says:
"....If one voluntarily stays in a city that is under siege, one has the status of a combatant.
The unintentional and undesirable killing of involuntarily remaining innocent civilians seems to this author to be the one "killing" activity which is permissible in Jewish law in war situations which would not be permissible in the pursuer/self-defense situations. Just like Jewish law permits one to send one's own soldiers out to combat (without their consent) to be perhaps killed, Jewish law would allow the unintentional killing of innocent civilians as a necessary (but undesired byproduct) of the moral license of war
source: http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/war3.html
Interestingly it considers an auhtorized war the war of conquest of territories:
"The king must first wage only obligatory wars. What is an obligatory war? It is a war against the seven nations, the war against Amalek, and a war to deliver Israel from an enemy who has attacked them. Then he may wage authorized wars, which is a war against others in order to enlarge the borders of Israel and to increase his greatness and prestige."
source: http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/war2.html
The site says that the usage of nuclear weapons is permissable:
The use of tactical (battlefield) nuclear weapons designed solely to be used on the field of battlefield would, in circumstances where the complete destruction of the combatants be permissible, (such as after the proper warning and peace seeking) would be acceptable.
Ma'a-salaama,